Sunday, July 12, 2026

The Inland Range of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker in South Carolina; an Ecological Perspective.

Out of convenience, and obtuseness that empirical ornithology did not exist centuries ago the Ivory-billed Woodpeckers' precontact and historical range in South Carolina and other states has been placed at the Fall Line.

South Carolina Sprunt and Chamberlain (1949) suggest that Ivory-billed Woodpecker was formerly common over much of the eastern part of the state but its virtual extinction was due to the encroachment of civilization.

The original range of Ivory-billed Woodpecker in South Carolina was the extent of the coastal plain bordered to the north by the fall line and extending to the Atlantic coast. This area was comprised of bottomland hardwood riverine systems surrounded by longleaf pine uplands intermixed with farms and plantations.     
Recovery Plan for the Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) April, 2010
Most, if not all Congaree National Park, SC's biology researchers are familiar with John Cely. In 2023, he wrote that Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis; IBWO) locality records extend as far inland as South Carolina’s Fall Line. He espoused that there is no ecological reason to exclude the Congaree River corridor, which lies well below the Fall Line, from the 19th-century IBWO range.


Cely, Page 1 2023

The Fall Line marks a sharp geological transition where the Piedmont’s hard, elevated bedrock gives way to the Coastal Plain’s soft, sandy sediments. While this boundary has substantial ecological implications for “the great chieftain of the woodpecker tribe” (Audubon), it was likely not an absolute barrier to IBWO dispersal or even nesting in landscapes of gradually increasing elevation above the Fall Line. IBWO density was probably lower above the Fall Line than below it across relevant states, because the line also delineates two distinct biotas.

Cely, Page 2 2023


Upon an ecological presentation here, there is no reason precontact Ivory-bills did not inhabit all of the land southeast of the Fall Line in SC. IBWOs likely inhabited some select areas above the Fall Line also (see map within). 

As a facultative omnivore but obligate feeder of larval Coleoptera during the breeding season, IBWO distribution would have been somewhat constrained by beetle density and community composition especially if females have site fidelity which is suspected. Accordingly, breeding range and density should correlate with micro and macrohabitats supporting high biomass of saprophytic Coleopteran larvae and adults. This food limitation likely diminished post-fledging, when parents and altricial young became vagile as a group and could exploit resources at slightly higher latitudes and/or elevations. Proposed is only minor "incursions" of breeding north of the Fall Line; no proposal for large interstate expansion of the IBs historical range is argued.   

In foothill regions, a historical symbiosis with beaver-driven hydrology may have further influenced IBWO occurrence, a hypothesis consistent with the observed pattern of reports and specimens declining with increasing altitude and latitude. Finally, seasonal differentiation in foraging strategy should be considered a potential evolutionary driver for precontact IBWOs.

Post-breeding resource availability may have made it advantageous for Ivory-billed Woodpeckers (Campephilus principalis; IBWO) to avoid depleting select beetle families in lowland habitats. Fruits, nuts, and other insect taxa became more concentrated and accessible from early summer through early December, preceding the subsequent IBWO breeding season from early December to at least April.



Three notable locations with IBWO reports. 1. is referred to by Tanner, Cely and others. 2. summarizes years of modern work by many. 3. is based on reports with some suggestive modern videos. 



Many North American birds shift seasonally with altitude, temperature, and food availability. A U.S. example is the American Dipper (Cinclus mexicanus), which moves to higher-elevation foraging and breeding areas in summer.

The Fall Line creates a sharp ecological divide in South Carolina. Above the line, rivers are faster and narrower, flowing over rocky, clay-rich soils. Below it, rivers slow and widen into floodplains with sandy soils. This transition produces distinct ecosystems and plant communities. The extensive floodplains, slower rivers, and warmer, sandier environments of the Coastal Plain support greater diversity of reptiles, amphibians, other lowland wildlife, and IBWOs.


SC data. Note the winter 10-degree lower average temperature difference between the two areas. Warm blooded animals like IBs face a large increase in energetic costs to survive cold nights. Average temperatures are impactful but extreme temperatures erect not only another barrier for IB breeding, but a lethal one at higher elevations. 




Record cold winter day in SC that shows the potentially fatal temperatures that warm-blooded, omnivores are exposed to. Note the 25 degree drop from the frigid coastal plain to the Appalachians.   Cold Winter 1985



Zoogeographic limitations are often determined by the extremes not the averages. Birds can die in one night from these extremes. There is no evidence that Ivory-bills were a migratory species but seasonal movements were possible and may be the source of some historic higher elevation reports and records.




Typical IBWO range map that roughly adheres to the Fall Line at least in SC.

Consequently, IBWO breeding success and population density was likely higher below the Fall Line, correlating positively with warmer late-winter and early-spring temperatures and increased forest humidity relative to the Piedmont. The inner and outer Coastal Plain, both below the Fall Line, likely supported a denser, richer community of saprophytic beetles than the drier, cooler upland forests above it. 

Multiple studies report positive relationships between invertebrate biomass and temperature, humidity, and lower elevation.


General Humidity Chart, Coleopteran density, community diversity and biomass is positively correlated to humidity.   



However, beavers, which were abundant in the precontact era, may have partially altered this pattern by damming high-energy streams above the Fall Line. Beaver-induced tree mortality would have provided substantial, though spatially constrained, foraging substrate for breeding IBWOs along narrow, linear corridors bordering former stream channels that became ponds. Riverine wetlands, including small rivers, streams, and creeks, thus succeeded into a discontinuous series of lacustrine wetlands such as ponds, bogs, and swamps. These lacustrine systems create dynamic forest ecotones with elevated densities of stressed and standing dead trees.

Critical SC area that portrays an ecological approach to the IBWO breeding range represented by thick blue line. The feather like blue areas delineate precontact riparian/stream corridors likely dammed by beavers, these areas then supporting some IBs. The 3 red dots represent the 3 inland IBWO data points discussed in the text which were near the Fall Line.  











Tanner, 1942 summary of records. Note that 2 is on other unique maps here; that report was close to the Fall Line and may have been a family group inferring nearby breeding. Cely (2023) also brings up the April 1876 record of three IBs. The Santee River is one of the handful of areas that Tanner felt IBs were still occupying circa 1940. Per modern patterns of where 21st century IBs are, evidence, and acceptance of avian site fidelity, Tanner was fairly accurate with the locations he proposed still had IBs in 1939. 

 
The precontact IBWO breeding range in a biological context may have resembled a hand, with “fingers” of occupancy extending into higher elevations along beaver-dammed streams (see map). These corridors were heavily exploited by hunters and trappers. Beavers were reduced over centuries and were effectively extirpated from South Carolina by the early 1900s. IBWO populations declined concurrently, likely due to direct shooting, logging, elimination of beavers, and then agriculture clearing in the valleys of the upland areas and lowlands, with remnant populations contracting into the sinuous riparian corridors of the Coastal Plain.

National Biodiversity Parks, Inc. (NBP) conducted multi-year point surveys for IBWO in coastal and inland South Carolina, both below and above the Fall Line. Several IB detections and one visual sighting occurred only in the central part of the state, approximately 35 mi south of the Fall Line, within the largest remaining expanse of old-growth bottomland hardwood forest east of the Mississippi River. All detections used methods authorized under federal permit.

In 2023, John Cely discussed several inland records relative to the Fall Line, a geologic and topographic feature often used to approximate the historical IBWO range in South Carolina. To this author’s knowledge, as of 7/12/2026, no specimens have been documented from the Congaree River, despite its entire stretch being below the Fall Line. The Congaree River is formed by the confluence of the Saluda and Broad Rivers. The Saluda basin originates at the Fall Line and once extended farther west. Construction of the Dreher Shoals Dam and creation of Lake Murray between 1927 and 1930 inundated ∼50,000 acres and displaced any IBWOs present. Prior to impoundment, the river was ∼220 ft above sea level and the area was sparsely settled.

Flooding altered hydrology, with backwater effects, a higher water table, reduced flow, and expansion of swamp and palustrine habitats. Any remaining IBWOs should have found forage along the new shoreline, while many hydrophytic trees died as water levels and the water table rose substantially.


Early in the 2020s, reports of one or more IBWOs emerged from a rural area in northwestern South Carolina with numerous large trees and several disjunct 500-acre patches of older second-growth forest within a fragmented matrix of roads, farms, clear-cuts, residences, timber stands, small parks, and wooded streams. The reports were accompanied by several low-quality cell phone images and videos, four or five which were suggestive of an IBWO and female IBWO.








Upon request, we visited the immediate and surrounding area and located the perch trees shown in the videos. We observed bark scaling consistent with, but not diagnostic of, IBWO. The sightings were adjacent to a 700-acre private forest tract with limited seclusion in some seasons.







To assess IBWO status in northwestern South Carolina, we analyzed aerial imagery to identify the largest contiguous, roadless forest blocks and consulted foresters and biologists regarding woodpecker activity, standing dead wood, seclusion, recent fires, and forest DBH. We then conducted point surveys, transects, and bark-scaling inspections across a 50 × 100 mi area.



 
No definitive evidence of IBWO was observed or obtained. Northwestern South Carolina and the Lake Murray region likely do not harbor a hidden IBWO metapopulation, although occasional seasonal or dispersing pairs may transit the area. This is consistent with conclusions of the South Carolina Ivory-billed Woodpecker Working Group (SCIBWWG) and NBP, though we consider the Working Group’s conclusion that breeding does not occur in Congaree National Park (CNP) to be unsupported.



Over seven days, we surveyed a roughly C-shaped route that included the Broad River, multiple sites in Francis Marion and Sumter National Forests including the Long Cane Ranger District, Belfast WMA, The Territories, and several areas near Lake Murray. Bark scaling on pines was extensive and attributable to Pileated Woodpeckers (Dryocopus pileatus); scaling on stressed deciduous trees was minimal.

We also surveyed the upper Edisto River and CNP, with CNP yielding the only suggestive IBWO sign after only a 4-hour hike in. These results indicate abundant Pileated Woodpeckers in northwestern South Carolina and few, if any, IBWOs, though occasional IBWO pine scaling in competition with Pileateds, etc. remains possible.

In summary, IBWO range in South Carolina was roughly constrained by the Fall Line and the inherent ecological implications. However, the pre-contact range was likely slightly larger than most published maps, based on an ecological model in which temperature and humidity are positive predictors of coleopteran biomass per unit area. Greater coleopteran biomass and diversity would be expected to increase IBWO fledging rates. The species likely bred to elevations of at least 202 m in an interdigitated pattern along streams commonly dammed by beavers, which maintained a continuous supply of stressed and standing dead wood that supported pertinent beetle communities and biomass.



Consistent with records emphasized by Tanner and Cely in South Carolina, NBP agrees with Cely (2023) that there is no ecological reason to exclude the Congaree River corridor from 19th-century IBWO range, given its location well below the Fall Line. NBP teams also detected modern IBWOs in CNP on multiple occasions, further supporting historical occupancy of the river corridor.

NBP point surveys and hikes in select northwestern South Carolina sites yielded no IBWO sign. Our data infers but does not confirm the absence of an IBWO metapopulation in northwestern South Carolina. Lake Murray reports had some supporting evidence but only of possible dispersal from presently unknow secluded IB breeding area(s). CNP is an obvious possibility and SCIBWWG (2013) assertions on no breeding there is premature.

More point surveys are needed in SC and elsewhere to produce data on the IB's modern persistence.

Bibliography

  1.  "South Carolina Record Maximum Temperatures and Date". South Carolina State Climatology Office. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. Retrieved 4 February 2010.
  2.  "Map of South Carolina Record Maximum Temperatures and Year". South Carolina State Climatology Office. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. Retrieved 4 February 2010.
  3.  "South Carolina Record Minimum Temperatures and Date". South Carolina State Climatology Office. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. Retrieved 4 February 2010.
  4.  "Map of South Carolina Record Minimum Temperatures and Year". South Carolina State Climatology Office. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. Retrieved 4 February 2010.

 

 

 






Sunday, June 7, 2026

The 2008 Ivory-billed Woodpecker Video and Perspectives from Two Biologists

 

 Chuck Hunter and I had a recent Facebook exchange on the 2008 IBWO video; I link to the conversation below in a compilation otherwise it will be buried into FB obscurity. 



New FB post of 6/7/2026

Posts/comments 1, 2, etc are below for chronological reading.  

Chuck's habit of denying that the pivotal part of our knowledge often relies on inferential science always allow him to believe he escapes factual points.  He clings to that belief as if a fact but antithetically places most video conclusions into beliefs and not facts.

 I said " If its appears as a possible IB you think you think you would download it yourself and spend a few hours toggling the frames back and forth."

I am of course referring to the original video file and have said so and written, formally and informally many times that "a download of the original movie file (very large) from Collins is need and is available on the link provided" . 

Chuck said "I have toggled the images more than you could guess, including your edited images, over the years. "

Chuck leaves it ambiguous to what media iteration he has "toggled back and forth". He certainly has not asked for any original video files from me. Many files that are quite intriguing and are a must see in some respects. That despite him and most knowing that FB and Google (where Virrazzi, 2022 article is hosted) compress and degrade original ID data in a video that we collectively say IS or COULD BE one of the rarest birds on Earth. 

Chuck is working on things as I am so forgiveness to both of us for not sharing files. But forgiveness doesn't imply that Chuck has done the best job on the 2008 video or that he should be forgiven from coming to his usual hedged conclusions without noting this flaw or gap in his analysis. After all this is said to be by perhaps hundreds of thousands to be the best evidence of the IBWO's 21st century persistence. Let's not forget that engineers, biologists, mathematicians, avian flight specialists, etc. went to the secluded sighting spot and measured and gauged all this very carefully or looked at the video. All conclude there is a Campephilus double knock heard, the bird has a 30 inch wingspan, has a large trailing white edge, is a large woodpecker, has a very high wing Hz, is going at 34 mph (notable) and much more. We will get to molt, a smoking gun.  

If this bird was fleeing from a murder scene the BOLO would read "Ivory-billed Woodpecker killed a scientist from Stennis; video evidence overwhelming."

On molt Chuck graciously leaves that to me. Thanks. It's there. A draft paper is posted I believe. The IBWO specimens have been examined by others, and the literature review is advanced.  We need (or really do not, see nuanced details) to have the skeptics come to some consensus (after we herd these emotional cats) and tell us what species it is or might be, so every species molt phenology in SE USA need not be compared. Chuck needs to love or hate Redheads and say so. (Hint Redheads molt well N and after their breeding).  The ABA tragedy of its human publicly calling for an IBWO to be shot must stop his waffle and take a guess on species. 

Regardless as inferred above, the IBWO specimens and Pyles work say IBWO and Picidae molting and breeding phenology are like a temporal fingerprint, pointing squarely to IBWO, not PIWO, not kingfishers, not ducks, and on and on.  

Chuck "Tobalske, I did reach out to him to hear more of what he had to say, but he made it clear that he wanted to have nothing more to do with Collins and he told me his interpretations were no longer to be used when it became clear that Collins regularly misidentified the birds he said he was seeing while he was videoing them. Tobalske, like me, had assumed Collins was seeing the birds well enough to correctly identify them before videoing, but after a series of his posted videos demonstrated otherwise, Collins was proven to be an unreliable observer when trying to video these birds."


I find it hard to follow the chronology of Tobalske's change of mind on certain IB things and how to separate out if you biased him against Collins and had impartial conversations with Tob. I had the luxury of asking Collins what happened and he said "people got to him from the skeptical side" and "he became more aware of the controversy". I see and saw nothing contextually wrong with Collins' explanation.  


Regardless that was not only what I asked Chuck. I was curious about the specifics on wing-binding.  Because Collins allegedly mis-IDed birds (he did once at least briefly) it's being extrapolated into a stretch. 

Collins was hanging out of a precarious perch with one hand on a branch and one on the camera; one mis ID is allowed; we likely couldn't do better even if one of us was foolish enough to get up there. The foolish is inserted to connect my long-standing points made to Collins before the 2008 video "that modern landscape ecology makes it less likely a bird flys above the canopy. Mike keep an eye below the tree". 

Regardless, and I am repeating, how does Collins' mistakes change the pixels, speed, molt, double knock, etc. in the 2008 video? 


It's realized that Chuck is summarizing many verbal records with no video or media so he highly values accuracy of descriptions, skill levels and poor ID conclusions by the reporter. However, in the rare occasion when a video exists Chuck seems unable to break away from his usual integrity checking methods, sometimes with no pragmatic utility, and just look at facts in the video. 

If John W and others who actually could not tell a crested, minute Tufted Titmouse from a crested, large Ivory-billed came in with a suggestive flight video, with a double knock, I would say "great job John, lets see what Tobalske says".  And I wouldn't need to inform Tobalske about John's prior horrific fumbles if not pertinent to some general or finer point Tobalske is committing to.   

This Thread Started Here.

From the thread link right above here is the Original First Post followed by comments. The OP has IBWO videos, etc

Original Post

Fred wrote I am going to attach here, or eventually in comments several IBWO videos unfortunately compressed by Facebook.
Some scientists' Ivory-billed evidence assessments are pushing positions that the even "the girl with kaleidoscope eyes" would fall out of the sky over.
Lowly insects focus their thousands of lenses into one useful image to make a final, cognitive decision.
So, no we are not going to let some illogical rationalization dissipate the IBWO-like, double knock in the Pearl River video into non-existence. It's real.. The videographer detected it, immediately pointed the camera to the area he heard it from, and then in that exact direction an IBWO-like bird flies under him a minute later.
It is not a Pileated, kingfisher, or Redhead-like double knock. The bird that flies right under us is not Pileated, kingfisher, or Redhead-like. The bird has 20 characteristics of an IBWO. An evidence review must include the double knock in some fair, weighting model. It double knocks and looks like a Campephilus, says Descartes from the grave. Chuck wrote Fred Virrazzi with an imagination, yes I see for less than a split second what appear to be “light” stripes down the back and what appears to be a “light” bill. However, I cannot muster enough imagination to claim the “dark” plumage is (as it should be) a very shiny deep black color and the “light” secondaries are not bright white “flags” as some observers of known Ivory-bills describe the white in the wings. Explaining the optical issues away is where skepticism is justified in my view. Yes to a potential encounter, no to something that serves as firm documentation.

Fred wrote

  
Chuck Hunter Jordan Alan Jeez Chuck if you can see anything suggesting an IBWO on Facebook or in my on-line article 2022 you think you would download it yourself and spend a few hours toggling the frames back and forth. The synchronous molt was found that way; it was not easy. But the molt is there in the download and it's in March!!!
Quite a smoking gun if you know your bird molt phenology. You should be able to find something novel in that video or in the other IB evidence.
The 2022 article was not presented by several contributors for poor FB analysis. it was done to assist the USFWS with this 2008 video because as we know a certain person does not play well in the sandbox. Chuck was the person who recognized potential in the 2008 video and the derivative 2022 article. Others like Jordan Allen with an older account was around too, and others here.
Funny how I had considered Redhead and dismissed it years ago with reason, yet you think it was a possible confusing species. Is that as close to skeptical smoking gun you can come up with? No fear here; its not any duck.
By the way a smoking gun is not "Collin's makes mistakes" when there is a video, with a double knock and measurements presented.
But do we accept Tobalske's binding input? This wing binding is a few dozen milliseconds presented over a few rotations. Collin's then has some odd comparative graphs (Tobalske's) of the wing tips in his publication,
USFWS or me should have called Tobalske and explored this smoking gun's veracity. If that esoteric point is a smoking gun than a synchronous molt over many frames in March is a smoking cannon.
Another smoking gun is the very unusual sky pointing, 2 frames, and adjacent mating frame in the 2019 LA Game cam compilation. This is important to all IB researchers and the conservation community because it exhibits some level of viability in 2019. The 2019 29 minute had setup and technical mistakes, but the compilation is close to spectacular in that it shows a likely IB family group-----so it is more evidence of recent, significant IB breeding viability.
Another smoking gun could have been the Pulliam observation of bowed wings (AR 2004 video) but I recall he did not press that point until the Imperial Woodpecker showed the same thing according to him and eventually others.
Another impossible to see without slowed down sequences being extracted and looped------------then you let the human brain do what it does best now after a million years. It will sort out things. Then the eye's have it. ---the leading edge of the IBWO wings breaks away from the different mottled texture of the dark bayou bottom. You then see the extent of the black in the leading half of the wings. Wow---dead on for IBWO. But the back. The birds back as an additional dark gray shaded part of this winged being-----its gray because of the stripes are poorly resolved and black plus thin white stripes at 100 feet with motion blur will often be and to some extent should be seen as gray-----that's what we have. This smoke irritates the skeptics and lovers of Redheads.
Color fidelity is very good in this video; not convinced at all by Chucks hesitation. Chuck owes us a smoking gun...that's how I see it. If the darks are alleged to be off for IB get some actual mud mailed to me and him and we will work on it with cameras at 100 feet.
and backlit conditions. Quite exacerbating that some (Chuck) will not see the white out on the high branches as proof that things might and do show up lighter than they are in that video.
Chuck has the ability to find a smoking gun and is taking retirement way too literally.

  • Reply
  • Share


Chuck wrote

 Fred Virrazzi always appreciate a challenge from you here. Again, I see images that are suggestive of an Ivory-bill and I dare say I have toggled the images more than you could guess, including your edited images, over the years. Despite all that, I still see images that at best are suggestive, nothing more and nothing less. I see no smoking gun. I take your word on molt, as I am not an expert on that, and frankly with respect to Ivory-bill no one can really be an expert regarding living Ivory-bills. That said, you make an interesting case, but I cannot agree that it is conclusive without some independent review by known experts on molting patterns. Have you run your assessment by someone, such as at a museum, who has access to a number of specimens that could examine them for the type of molt you are claiming is dispositive? If you have and I just missed the passage where you have relayed that opinion from an unbiased source, I apologize. As for Tobalske, I did reach out to him to hear more of what he had to say, but he made it clear that he wanted to have nothing more to do with Collins and he told me his interpretations were no longer to be used when it became clear that Collins regularly misidentified the birds he said he was seeing while he was videoing them. Tobalske, like me, had assumed Collins was seeing the birds well enough to correctly identify them before videoing, but after a series of his posted videos demonstrated otherwise, Collins was proven to be an unreliable observer when trying to video these birds. All Tobalske had to say is that his past interpretations all had been based on the assumption that Collins at least had videoed a big woodpecker and if we can’t be sure of that, his interpretations are not to be considered in any way an “endorsement” from him that “these images have to be Ivory-bills.” He made it clear to me, that even if one or more of Collins’ videos are actually large woodpeckers (including 2008), in his opinion we cannot discount that they are all Pileated Woodpeckers. Tobalske told that to Collins from the first time he provided his interpretations to him and when Collin’s kept invoking his name as a sort of endorsement, he made it clear he needed to stop doing that. Nothing here changes my opinion either for the Collins 2008 video, the Luneau 2004 video, and collectively all the Latta et al. evidence as suggestive but not conclusive. They are all potential encounters, that are not obviously another species, but could be abnormally flying and/or abnormally plumaged Pileateds in the case of Luneau and Latta woodpeckers, and again a wide range of species for the 2008 Collins video. I don’t personally think so, but can’t exclude the possibility either. I appreciate that you value my opinion enough to keep trying, but it really isn’t me you have to convince. That I’m not dismissing out of hand Collin’s 2008 video, like I have all his others, should be considered progress. Thanks!


Then comes the next new post which is in the first section of this article  

- - - -------  



#IvoryBilledWoodpecker #woodpeckers #rarebirds #wingbeatfrequency #endangeredspecies #Picidae #PearlRiver #Virrazzi #LuneauVideo